home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.19981211-19990422
/
000179_news@watsun.cc.columbia.edu _Sat Jan 30 08:19:02 1999.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
2KB
Return-Path: <news@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>
Received: from newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.30])
by watsun.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA22940
for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>; Sat, 30 Jan 1999 08:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
by newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA09585
for kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu; Sat, 30 Jan 1999 08:05:39 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu: news set sender to <news> using -f
From: mayhew@wku.edu
Subject: K95 text
Date: 29 Jan 99 23:35:59 -0600
Organization: Western Kentucky University
Message-ID: <qV$8oghqoW1V@axp1.wku.edu>
To: kermit.misc@mailrelay2.cc.columbia.edu
I'd like to switch to K95 but need the answer to a question I asked
here about a year ago with no response. I use DOS kermit under Win98
simply because of its large DOS text full-screen terminal screen.
I understand that K95 is a full-screen console app; what I don't know
and can't determine from any doc or screen shots on the K95 home page
is this: In full-screen mode, is the text comparable to standard
full-screen DOS text-mode text? I'm tired of dealing with telnet
programs that offer a bunch of font and size options, all of them
graphics based, none of them with the solidity of DOS kermit text and none
of them sized exactly to fit a standard 80x25 DOS text screen display.
But if K95 offers both Telnet and a terminal screen with text like that
of msdos Kermit, I'll buy it immediately.
Regards,
Larry Mayhew mayhew@wku.edu